commitment to environmental stewardship.
"You
may think that someone with a B, C, or D got that because they don't
care about the environment, but that's not true," he said.
The
rubric weights preservation of habitat highly. So a resort may be taking
action to protect its watershed and fight global warming, but if they
make a new run or increase snowmaking their score will be poor, he said.
"It's
important people read the whole report," he said.
For example,
Canyons scored high in most areas, but was docked a large numbers of
points for development, ramped-up snowmaking and not promoting public or
shared transportation.
Paul Joyce, research director for the
coalition, said large resorts with a lot of lodging and skier services
have a big footprint on the mountain many of which are public lands.
Being good stewards of the forest is more important than catering to
luxury travelers, he argued.
"We want to help people be aware of
the choices they make," he said. "Let's be mountain towns and ski areas
and not worry about keeping up with the Joneses and real estate."
When
skiers begin thinking about the environmental responsibility of their
favorite ski area, they also tend to think more about their own carbon
footprint and what they can do to be a better steward of the land in
their own life, he said.
To "forgive" resorts for past
development, the grading rubric returns 20 percent of missed points
every year so the expansion or building project no longer stings the
resort five years later, he explained.
Currently, the rubric does
not reward Utah resorts for being so close to an international airport
and thereby reducing the fuel used to transport skiers, he said.
Joyce
said he believes the "grades" have helped prompt resorts to think
"green" over the past decade. Many now have a staff member focused on
environmental initiatives.
But realistically, he said many
"green" initiatives also make good business sense and would have been
implemented with or without the advocacy of groups like his.
An
example of that may be PCMR's renovated lighting on Payday. Giles said
the project helped them win favor with the coalition, but was done
because the old system was antiquated.
"We went from using 1,500
watts per light to 150 watts," he said. "That's a savings in energy of
130,000 to 150,000 kilowatt hours."
PCMR also purchased more
efficient snowmaking equipment.
"We're continually changing to
more efficient ways of operating," he added.
Deer Valley Resort
president Bob Wheaton said they were thrilled with their "A" grade.
"Deer
Valley certainly shares the same values as the coalition in being the
best stewards of the land that we possibly can be," he said. "The
coalition is truly one of the most well-respected efforts with support
from many other organizations worldwide."
Canyons Resort also
said they support the group's effort.
"Although we are certainly
disappointed in our drop in score from the Ski Area Citizens Coalition
from last year, and it may not clearly represent all of our initiatives,
the report card provides us a great framework for environmental
responsibility for The Canyons," said Dana Edwards, mountain operations
and resort sustainability manager. "SACC is a valued organization and we
look forward to working with them in the future as we do with all of
our non-profit partners. The Canyons staff and management are very
dedicated to environmental stewardship and we will continue to work
towards meeting all of the goals that we have set for ourselves and the
community."
by Andrew Kirk OF THE RECORD STAFF : The Park Record
For More Information on Park City and Deer Valley Contact:
Michael Lapay
Prudential Utah Real Estate
Mobile: 435-640-5700
Toll Free: 888-410-7653
mlapay@pureparkcityrealestate.com